The Emissions Monitoring Competitive Landscape

The emissions monitoring landscape is a crowded one, ranging from fence line monitoring to aircraft, drones, and spaced-based systems.

Each emissions monitoring alternative fits into its own niche, depending on its features and attributes.

Sorting emissions monitoring options in a logical way can help you more quickly determine which method, or combination of methods, is best for your operational profile.

The graphic below illustrates our view of the emissions monitoring competitive landscape.

Scalability: The ability to scale is important for organizations expecting an increase in the monitoring area. For example, an oil and gas company’s field-wide development plan may call for new wells over the course of a few years. As the number of wells and/or production pads increase in the area of operations, the ability to increase monitoring capability across the incremental facilities is an important factor. This may not be as critical for more mature assets or those that will remain in place for an extended duration (i.e., a pipeline or midstream storage facility).

Scheduled vs. Continuous Monitoring: In our blog article Emissions Monitoring Systems: Scheduled vs. Continuous, we covered the various emissions monitoring options and their pros and cons. In summary, Scheduled emissions monitoring options are typically good for evaluating large and/or difficult to reach areas, while continuous monitoring is the best practice for ongoing operations and mitigating fugitive emissions by detecting and mitigating fugitive emissions.

In our white paper The Case for Continuous Emissions Monitoring we cover energy trends, the sources of methane leaks, the value of emissions monitoring solutions and why continuous emissions monitoring for methane is the best practice for mitigating emissions at oil and gas production facilities and midstream operations.

About Earthview

Earthview is your partner on the journey to net zero. Our affordable precision air quality monitoring solutions provide the highest return on investment on emissions detection. BluBird sensors are operating reliably in multiple oil and gas producing regions for leading operators in Colorado, the Permian Basin, the Barnett Shale and the Appalachian Basin.

We deliver actionable results at a fraction of the price of competing offerings. More information is available on our website at Earthview.io. 

Contact

Earthview Corporation
Bear Givhan
CEO and Co-Founder
E: Bear@Earthview.io
T: (303) 438-8574

Previous
Previous

Earthview Corporation CEO and Co-Founder Bear Givhan to Participate in Digital Wildcatters ZERO Event

Next
Next

Emissions Monitoring Systems: Scheduled vs. Continuous